How to Be An Ally

9 Comments

The "A" in QLTBAG is often said to stand for Ally; sometimes it also stands for Asexual. There are a lot of people who identify as an ally who also identify as heterosexual. That's great, it really is, and there's a lot a straight ally can do in terms of supporting human rights for all. But sometimes, inadvertently and unthinkingly, a straight ally makes it really uncomfortable for those who identify as one of the minorities in the letter soup of human relationships.

Here are some things to keep in mind about being an ally, especially in the context of commenting on posts on That Gay Blog, whose primary audience is made of up people who identify as part of the QLTBAG:

  • Use non-gendered language when talking about relationships. "Are you seeing anyone?" or "Are you in a relationship?" rather than "Do you have a boyfriend/girlfriend?" You can ask about a spouse, which applies to a partner of any sex in a committed relationship, rather than using husband and wife. And of course, there's always "partner," the term of choice for all manner of adults with romantic relationships. The point is not to assume anything about the other person's sexual orientation.
  • Keep in mind that many people may not conform to what you, or society, or your neighbor thinks are the gender-appropriate sexual roles and behaviors for "men" and "women." There are huge differences in times, cultures, religions, and individual preferences in terms of determining social and sexual roles. Please bear that in mind.
  • If a person indicates that he identifies as male, or she as female, remember and respect that. Refer to people with the names and identities they prefer. It's basic courtesy. If you're not sure how someone wants to be referred to, you can ask (politely and privately) "How you wish to be referred to?" Remember that biology is not destiny; we have minds and hearts as well as chromosomes.
  • Don't be silent if people make offensive remarks about those who identify as queer, or gay, or lesbian or bi or trans. Those remarks cause scars, and there's no telling how many people are being hurt. Remember the silent majority; there are almost always more people listening or reading than talking or posting.
  • Don't assume that you know a person's orientation automatically. Sometimes adults won't realize they aren't the people they thought they were until late in life. Don't assume someone is straight, and don't assume they aren't, either. Let people choose for themselves how they wish to be identified, and when.
  • If you identify as straight, be aware that your assumptions and privileges travel with you, and that some of them may be invisible to you, and quite hurtful to others. It's less than courteous, as a heterosexual parent, to ask a queer couple about plans for children, or weddings, for instance. Let your friends introduce the topic. You have rights that they don't, and protections, and privileges that they don't. As much as it may seem comforting to think that the gay or lesbian couple down the street is "just like you," in many ways, they aren't. It is therefore less than tactful, for instance, to verbally support queer rights and in the context of being supportive, keep reiterating that you're straight. You are in effect rubbing our noses in your privileged status.

I feel like all of these points are covered by basic human courtesy, but I keep seeing well-meaning people who identify as allies engaging in hurtful but thoughtless behaviors. At this point, I'd like to direct your attention to Plaid Adder's excellent, satirical, and very helpful A Straight Person's Guide To Gay Etiquette.

Comments

Thank you for this post,

Thank you for this post, Lisala. It's very helpful. I remember when I worked in a restaurant and was told to call everyone "sir" or "ma'am," and I felt really stupid doing it sometimes when I just didn't know which to use--and sometimes people looked angry or hurt when I did it. I stopped doing it on my own accord, and didn't last much longer at the job after that (not directly a cause for my leaving, though), but that's one of the first times I realized that some of the assumptions we make--even when just trying to be nice or polite--can actually be harmful.

Heterosexual people shouldn't make assumptions about other heterosexual people, either. Many couples cannot or do not wish to have children, which is fine. It seems like anyone who lives outside the supposed norm--doesn't want to get married or take someone's last name, doesn't want to have children, etc.--is a target for contempt. I had people making snide comments when I was "living in sin" unmarried--we were a complete family to me--and now that we finally did get married after over a decade of being together, I still experience hostility for not taking his name or "giving it" to my daughter.

I understand that I'm privileged to even have the right to do these things, and I don't mean to be obnoxious about that; I just wanted to point out that it would be beneficial for people to simply stop seeing their view point as "the" view point of the world and its inhabitants. There are many, many different ways to live and they should all be respected.

Thanks sarajean

As you say, many people simply forget to think about things from someone else's pov. It's certainly easy to do.

This is supposed to be irony, right?

Srsly, sarajean? Your whole response to this post is how it's all about you, all about your comfort, and all about how not to make other straight people--people like you and your hubby--all uncomfortable?

Wow. Just wow.

Why are you even here again? Because ick.

I'm simply responding, as an

I'm simply responding, as an ally, from my own experience. I know I've made my own blunders in speech before, and I'm merely pointing out that the status quo seems to have its own set ideals for relationships in all forms, and that those ideals should not be placed on everyone.

You are referring to only part of my post, and I definitely never said it's all about me and my "comfort." I'd love the way we all see each other to reflect a deep caring and openness rather than the expectations and narrow relationship paradigm that so many see instead.

Like I posted, I don't mean to offend; that said, I think your "ick" response is really uncalled for. 

Oh Sarajean! Let them fight

Oh Sarajean! Let them fight their own battles! I don't think they really want any allies, I mean, then they wouldn't be a suffering minority anymore.  Gays can't even be allies anmong their own community. Remember the softball team of bisexuals who weren't gay enough for some gay league in Seattle? Seattle for christ's sake!

I think this orignal post and the reaction to you on this blog is just messed up!

Umm no

Pinky--look at your language. "They." And from "they" you move to gays. All gays; you've just made a sweeping statement about an entire group.

Note, please, that I'm not asking you or anyone else to "fight my battles."

Moreover, the minute you move to an all encompassing "Gays can't even be allies among their own community," you're making an assertion about an awful lot of people in a group. That's called bigotry.

Yes, pinky, you've just outed yourself as a bigot.

Your accusation about all gays being  also unfounded. Yes, there are idiotic splits in queer culture--but you absolutely won't find it in all "gays," and you certainly won't find me casting aspersions on people who identify as bi.

Note too, please, you've moved from an adjective, to a noun. "Gays," used the way you're using it, as a noun, is typically a marker of a hostile statement.

I'm not inclined to put up with much of this sort of thing. It's not helpful, and it's a waste of time.

 

Not Hating

OK, I admit my language was uncalled for and making sweeping judgements about all gays is absolutely stupid. I apologize. I was re-acting more to the way the other commentor was being treated, and granted maybe I was reading too much into the tone. Anyway, it seems to me the sarajean is well-intentioned in her support of the QLTBAG community, and I don't really see anything wrong with that. I also thought your article brought up some really excellent advice that could very well be applied to any situation where one is dealing with people. I'm not here to be hating.

Absolutely

Sarajean absolutely is choosing to be an ally, and is well-intentioned.

There are others, though, who are quite different. Like the guy in this little anecdote:

http://lansing.craigslist.org/rnr/1797870768.html

These are all realistic events, that happen almost daily, though I think that several events may have been concatenated in the linked narrative.

#8 on this ad is very, very

#8 on this ad is very, very chilling. I'll never understand that, how people physically harm--even kill--anyone different from them. Do they feel threatened? Is it pure hatred? Even that, I don't get. How is someone else's life interfering with their life? And people all over the world live with the fear of this happening--and the reality of it happening--every day. It's just unconscionable. 

Again, I don't mean to offend anyone here. I'm just trying to be supportive.